I RENOUNCE MY "HUMAN RIGHTS"

I renounce my human rights, as set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations.
1* By accepting human rights, my consent is no longer required for actions to protect these rights. It is in the nature of universal human rights that, once accepted, the invitation is extended to those with the power to protect me. These rights are de facto seen as something for which consent is unnecessary
2* In reality this has come to mean, that powerful states feel that they have been given a de facto invitation, to militarily intervene anywhere on earth. The logic of human rights facilitates military expansionism. Since they are considered a "right", no consent is necessary to declare them. Since they are considered universal moral values, no objection to their enforcement can be valid. And since they are universal, no person or group can opt out from this enforcement. In this way an ethic is created, in which a superpower can conquer the world, claim it had a moral duty to do so.
4* Any oppression can be reformulated as a so-called "right". In practice, the enforcement of human rights imposes a value system. The European liberal and capitalist tradition /the Anglo-American liberalism.
5* The meaning of "protecting human rights" has been expanded without my consent, and in a way which I can not control. By “agreeing” to have my human rights "protected" by those powerful enough to do so, I have submitted, in the end, to whatever form of protection they choose. The appropriate action is to renounce the system entirely.

6* If I accept that I may not renounce "rights", which were declared for me by others (before I was even born), then I have ceased to be a free individual with a conscience.